|
Abstract
|
Assessment of the means and methods used in accordance with the criminal Procedure code of the Russian Federation and the Federal law “on crime detection activities” to obtain evidence of committing fraud involving the use of means of communication is given in the article. It
is stated that currently the investigative actions and means of proving and assessing the sources of evidence provided by the legislation do not fully meet the needs of law enforcement practice. As a
result of the analysis of the legislation of the Republic of Belarus and ukraine, the positive experience of these states in the field of crime detection and criminal procedural activities, which can be used by
the Russian legislation, is revealed. It is concluded that it is necessary to toughen the criminal liability for crimes committed with using telecommunication technologies, to specify the grounds for carrying
out crime detection actions limiting the constitutional rights of citizens, as well as to amend the criminal procedure legislation regarding the permission to apply to the court for conducting investigative actions
in case the judicial permission to conduct them is obligatory before the initiation of a criminal case, to specify the procedure for the identification of a person’s voice by phonogram, to establish the possibility of conducting investigative actions with using videoconferencing facilities at the stage of preliminary
investigation.
|
|
References
|
1. Komarov A.A. Kriminologicheskie aspekty moshennichestva v global’noy seti Internet. Kand. Diss. [Criminological aspects of fraud in the global Internet. Cand. Diss.]. Pyatigorsk, 2011. 262 р.
2. Mashlyakevich V.A. K voprosu o neobhodimosti provedeniya osmotra mesta proisshestviya pri rassledovanii moshennichestv, sovershaemyh s ispol’zovaniem sredstv telefonnoj svyazi [On the need to conduct an inspection of the scene of an investigation of fraud committed using telephone facilities]. Rossijskiy sledovatel’ – The Russian Investigator, 2015, no. 10, pp. 7-9.
3. Pupceva A.V. Nekotorye osobennosti pervonachal’nogo ehtapa rassledovaniya prestuplenij, sovershennyh s ispol’zovaniem sredstv mobil’noj svyazi [Some features of the initial stage of the investigation of crimes committed using mobile communications]. Sovremennaya yuridicheskaya nauka: teoreticheskiy i prakticheskiy vzglyad
[Modern legal science: theoretical and practical view]. Irkutsk, 2017. Pp. 125-126.
4. Dytchenko G.V., Nikitin E.L. Zakonnost’ provedeniya operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatij, ogranichivayushchih konstitucionnye prava grazhdan [Legality of the conduct of operational and search activities that limit the constitutional rights of citizens]. Kriminalist” – Criminalist, 2011, no. 1 (8), pp. 101-108.
5. Beytuganov Kh.A. Osobennosti rassledovaniya prestupleniy, sovershaemykh organizovannymi prestupnymi soobshchestvami, v usloviyakh Severo-Kavkazskogo regiona. Kand. Diss. [Features of investigation of crimes committed by organized criminal communities in the North Caucasus region. Cand. Diss.]. Moscow, 2001. 244 р.
6. Matveychev Yu.A. Ob”ekty i tsel’ pred”yavleniya dlya opoznaniya: diskussionnye voprosy v ugolovnom protsesse i kriminalistike [Objects and purpose of presentation for identification: discussion issues in the criminal process and criminalistics]. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Polotsk State
University. Series: Economic and legal sciences, 2017, no. 14, pp. 164-166.
|
